Search for: All records

In order to become bioactive, proteins need to be biosynthesized and protected from aggregation during translation. The ribosome and molecular chaperones contribute to both tasks. While it is known that some ribosomal proteins (r-proteins) interact with ribosome-bound nascent chains (RNCs), specific interaction networks and their role within the ribosomal machinery remain poorly characterized and understood. Here, we find that RNCs of variable sequence and length (beyond the 1st C-terminal reside) do not modify the apparent stability of the peptidyl-transferase center (PTC) and r-proteins. Thus, RNC/r-protein interaction networks close to the PTC have no effect on the apparent stability of ribosome-RNC complexes. Further, fluorescence anisotropy decay, chemical-crosslinking and Western blots show that RNCs of the foldable protein apoHmp1-140 have an N-terminal compact region (6394 residues) and interact specifically with r-protein L23 but not with L24 or L29, at the ribosomal-tunnel exit. Longer RNCs bear a similar compact region and interact either with L23 alone or with L23 and another unidentified r-protein, or with molecular chaperones. The apparent strength of RNC/r-protein interactions does not depend on RNC sequence. Taken together, our findings show that RNCs encoding foldable protein sequences establish an expanding specific interaction network as they get longer, including L23, another r-protein and chaperones. Interestingly, the ribosome alone (i.e., in the absence of chaperones) provides indiscriminate support to RNCs bearing up to ca. 190 residues, regardless of nascent-chain sequence and foldability. In all, this study highlights the unbiased features of the ribosome as a powerful nascent-protein interactor. 

Abstract Many proteins must interact with molecular chaperones to achieve their native state in the cell. Yet, how chaperone binding‐site characteristics affect the folding process is poorly understood. The ubiquitous Hsp70 chaperone system prevents client‐protein aggregation by holding unfolded conformations and by unfolding misfolded states. Hsp70 binding sites of client proteins comprise a nonpolar core surrounded by positively charged residues. However, a detailed analysis of Hsp70 binding sites on a proteome‐wide scale is still lacking. Further, it is not known whether proteins undergo some degree of folding while chaperone bound. Here, we begin to address the above questions by identifying Hsp70 binding sites in 2258Escherichia coli(E. coli) proteins. We find that most proteins bear at least one Hsp70 binding site and that the number of Hsp70 binding sites is directly proportional to protein size. Aggregation propensity upon release from the ribosome correlates with number of Hsp70 binding sites only in the case of large proteins. Interestingly, Hsp70 binding sites are more solvent‐exposed than other nonpolar sites, in protein native states. Our findings show that the majority ofE. coliproteins are systematically enabled to interact with Hsp70 even if this interaction only takes place during a fraction of the protein lifetime. In addition, our data suggest that some conformational sampling may take place within Hsp70‐bound states, due to the solvent exposure of some chaperone binding sites in native proteins. In all, we propose that Hsp70‐chaperone‐binding traits have evolved to favor Hsp70‐assisted protein folding devoid of aggregation.